Unpublishing Online Aritcles

By Hali Ortega

Online stories have a few perks for journalists. Stories online can be edited, updated, and allow readers to be active through comments. Still there is a downside to the online story: the unpublishing request.

A request for a story to be taken off websites emerge from reasons ranging from sources changing their mind, to people believing the story is unfair or inaccurate. Unlike print stories, these requests can actually be followed through. These online articles can be searched and found with a few key words, making requests to unpublish a possibility at any time.

Photo courtesy of Kate Ter Haar

Photo courtesy of Kate Ter Haar

For journalists this brings up the ethical dilemma of what qualifies to be unpublished and the repercussions of erasing history. Journalists generally follow four ethical guidelines: seek out truth and report it as fully as possible, act independently, minimize harm, and be accountable. When unpublishing an article, a balancing act between all of these ethics must occur.

Elizabeth Zwerling, an associate professor of journalism at the University of La Verne in Los Angeles County, gave a few examples on the issue of unpublishing online articles. In one request a friend of hers received she wrote, “In late 2005 he was asked to alter the archive of a 1999 story about same-sex couples by one of the sources profiled in the La Verne Magazine. “She said she wasn’t gay anymore,” said George Keeler, journalism professor and magazine adviser. ‘It was a painful thing, but I wrote her back and said I wasn’t going to erase (her past),’ The story, now eight years old, come up first when the source’s name is typed into Google and Yahoo!’s engines.”

Here the journalist felt the truth outweighed the harm from the story. When dealing with unpublishing stories these are the types of decisions journalists have to make.

In reality very few news organizations/journalists fully delete an article. Generally they find other ways to deal with the unpublish request as a compromise. Poynter details four other ways most unpublishing requests are dealt with:

  • Writing an addendum.

  • Taking a source’s name out of the story and/or removing the story from Google’s cache.

  • Running a correction.

  • Writing a follow-up story.

Although sometimes the story is simply left as is after weighing out the ethical choices. The matter of which ethic holds the most weight is up to the organiztion/journalist’s own discretion. 


3 responses to “Unpublishing Online Aritcles

  1. This is really interesting! I never thought about websites unpublishing articles before. I think it’s safe to say that once something is put on the Internet it is hard to get rid of completely.

  2. I agree with Steph in that I had never thought about this ethical dilemma before! This is a great post, Hali, because it highlights all the complexities of journalism in the age of technology. Although we’ve had hundreds of years to set boundaries and guidelines for print publications, we are all still trying to figure out how to navigate the online world of journalism. I’m glad that Poynter has those compromised solutions to deal with the concept of unpublishing. I think completely removing a story is extreme and we should probably instead focus on those other tactics that we also use in print like issuing corrections or writing a follow-up. Even in the new age of technology, journalists need to make sure they’re maintaing control of their product and, as long as it’s accurate, leaving it out there for others to read.

  3. This is definitely an issue, but I’m glad to know that most organizations and journalists have decided to stick to the journalism principles and not unpublish just because they can. Journalists should seek for the truth, and should always try to minimize harm. I understand that people and situations can change, but the information that the reporter has at the time the story is being published is the information that must be used. There are various ways to handle a request to unpublish without unpublishing, and these methods can help save the journalist’s or organization’s credibility and originality.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s