iPad alone can’t save print media

Project Magazine, iPad, App

Image from projectmag.com

The jury is still out on whether or not the iPad can save print media, though publishers of newspapers, magazines and books are hoping it can.

Truth is, however, moving from print and web to new platforms such as the iPad or its rivals can’t resurrect print media without help.

Newspapers and magazines don’t have it as easy as books. Both have to find ways to deliver content that entertain readers. Relying on text alone won’t help.

So when a newspaper or magazine moves to a platform such as the iPad, the app which people will use to access the material has to be exciting, innovative and social. Users want to get the news and interact with it, too.

Alice Rawsthorn discusses this in an article on The New York Times’ website. In the article, Rawsthorn says she has “come to the glum conclusion that most (magazine and book apps) were designed with little or no imagination.”

Rawsthorn, clearly a print media advocate, purposefully leaves out newspapers in her critique of iPad apps because she believes newspapers have had success reinventing their websites as apps.

I’ll let somebody with an iPad or smart phone determine whether or not she’s right.

She is correct to point out, however, that apps for magazines need to be as easy to read on a small screen as they are in print and take advantage of new technologies, such as videos, moving images and links to more information.

I would add that they need to take advantage of social media.

Virgin’s iPad-only Project Magazine is a good example of poor execution in incorporating social media. According to a review by Mashable, each page of the magazine has a link to a forum for discussing and users can e-mail images of full pages, but not complete articles. The images can’t be shared via Facebook or Twitter.

Uh, how did that happen?

Moving a newspaper, magazine or book to the iPad, or making it exclusively available to iPad users, is not going to breathe new life into print media if the product is not an easy, entertaining and informative experience for users.

The product also needs to incorporate social media sharing. The information generation now thrives on sharing information, which is why social media must be included.

Finally, as Rawthorne says, magazines and newspapers can’t pick up their content and plop it into an app. If the delivery wasn’t successful in print, it won’t work on an iPad screen.

Mashable’s review says the magazine’s special effects are fantastic. That’s great, but how did its editors and publishers overlook the need to incorporate sharing and social media? Did they think they could channel all conversation into their forums? According to Mashable, that isn’t working.

Can magazines and newspapers survive on the iPad if this is the end product?

Advertisements

4 responses to “iPad alone can’t save print media

  1. “If the delivery wasn’t successful in print, it won’t work on an iPad screen.” I agree with this statement. If the content in newspapers and magazines is not engaging audiences in print form, then I don’t believe the content will do any better online or on an iPad screen. Readers want information fast and easily. I’m a print advocate. I value newspapers, books, and magazine. I think they are a vital part of our society, and I don’t want to see them disappear. But at the same time I understand that consumers want interaction. Print media cannot offer videos, polls, and numerous pictures with the click of a button. The iPad can. However, if readers don’t like the New York Times in print or online, they aren’t going to use the iPad app.

  2. Well said, Jackie. I agree. If print journalism is to survive, magazine and newspaper publishers need to not only embrace new technology, but become leaders in how to use it.

  3. I think that magazines and newspapers will embrace the new technology. They have to, it’s the way the world is moving and I think they understand that. The iPad will help, but magazines and newspapers have to seek ways to reach out to their public.

  4. Not to mention that if the “end point” is the iPad, that excludes a lot of the potential market! I don’t nor do I ever plan to purchase an iPad, and I know I’m far from alone in that thought. I think that marketing to one specific device, no matter what it is, is a bad idea. Generalizing and making your product available to a broad audience should be the main goal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s