WikiLeaks exposes Embassy

Posted by Abby Wolner

WikilLeaks has done it again.

The online confessional has released the many sins of the US embassy in the form of 250,000 cables.  Unlike the last major leak, which exposed US soldiers to possible harm, the new batch of information prompts new ethical questions.

Much of the information leaked concerns US suspicions about other nations.  For example, as reported in The Guardian: “The extraordinarily close relationship between Vladimir Putin, the Russian prime minister, and Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister, which is causing intense US suspicion. Cables detail allegations of “lavish gifts”, lucrative energy contracts and the use by Berlusconi of a “shadowy” Russian-speaking Italiango-between.”

Clearly this information is somewhat speculative.  Therefore, its widespread publication could do more harm than good, causing increased tension between nations.

Other information, however, has been deliberately hidden by the government when it should be exposed.  US officials have apparently been told to spy on the UN and its leaders, for example.

Whether it should be or not, the information is now widely available.  There has been criticism from both sides, with some calling WikiLeaks the source for “restoring trust in modern journalism.”  Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, called the leak an attack on the international community.

I support WikiLeaks.  The truth is scary–there is a reason I don’t tell my roommate who drank the last swig of milk.  In the case of widespread government cover-ups, however, the truth is a necessity.  If this information causes harm, it’s not because of the information itself, it is because of those who acted wrongly.  Which side are you on?  Should WikiLeaks continue its unabashed exposure of truth or is it dangerous to any semblance of peace we have?



4 responses to “WikiLeaks exposes Embassy

  1. Jessica Anderson

    I am neutral when it comes to WikiLeaks. It is definitely frustrating that secret American documents continue to be leaked, but I believe that the fault of that lies more with our inability to keep secret documents secret. I do think that documents on WikiLeaks could damage some of our relationships with other countries and our global image as a whole. But I think that if documents were leaked from any other country, you would find similar scandalous information.

  2. I agree that other countries would also have secret, potentially relationship-ruining information. Doesn’t everyone? It’s no secret that certain countrys (and people) feel strongly against others, but no one would ever wish to share that information publicly.

  3. I think you both have good points. Secret information should be kept secret for a reason. I, however, think that the most of information released by WikiLeaks should be public. If the American government is acting unethically, the American people should know about it.

    • I agree that the government should be honest with the public, and if they’re not, the information should be made available. However, I don’t think WikiLeaks is the best medium for that exposure. Not everything the site is releasing has been kept from the public. Not everything needs to be known. The government needs to protect its citizens. This information can put us all at harm. I don’t like that idea. The information needs to be regulated.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s